On 24th May the Victorian Government issued a statement phasing out grazing of cattle in the Victorian Alpine National Park. Grazing is still allowed in the adjoining alpine state forests.
The Mountain Cattlemens Association of Victoria is outraged. Their spokesperson, Simon Turner, said
The decision to remove cattle grazing from the Alpine National Park has devastated mountain cattlemen, consigned a 170 year-old widely loved tradition of destroying delicate alpine flora and undermining the sensitive alpine ecosystem to the dusty shelves of history*
Here is a photo of an alpine herbfield near Mt Kosciuszko in New South Wales, where no grazing is allowed, showing abundant flowering of Silver Snow Daisies, Eyebright and Billy Buttons.
Not much to look at really, they are mostly white flowers and who likes white flowers.
Compare that image with this delightful bog in the Victorian high country that is the result of cattle grazing. It is used by the cattle as a drinking source and wallow and just look at the lovely symetrical pattern that the stock paths make across the delicate heath.


The federal government, gleefully seizing an opportunity to bash their political opponents who hold government in Victoria, is similarly outraged. Australian Minister for the Environment and Heritage Senator the Hon. Ian Campbell is quoted as saying

The Man from Snowy River is deep in the Australian psyche. This legend is part of Australia's heritage that simply cannot be lost. It should be noted that these 'men from Snowy River' work just 7900 cattle over an enormous high country area of 340,000 hectares - the equivalent of just one animal every 23 MCGs.
Which somewhat overlooks the fact that The Man From Snowy River was engaged in capturing wild horses and removing them from the Alpine region not grazing cattle there. Let's ignore that, one would presume he is also advocating the restoration and protection of Australias maritime heritage as well, vis-a-vis whaling off the south-west coast.
The Mountain Cattlemen are feeling dispossessed, their heritage is under threat, their whole way of life is challenged. They think of themselves as custodians of this fragile ecosystem. This places them in an excellent position to appreciate the plight and the indignation of the Taungurung clans, the traditional occupants of central Victoria including the alpline region. The Mountain Cattlemen want their way of life, their heritage preserved, their culture maintained in exactly the same way that the Taungurung did when the ancestors of Mountain Cattlemen drove them from their land, herded them on reserves, pursued a program of assimilation that denied them their culture, their language, their identity. The clock has come full circle for the Mountain Cattlemen, and in some multi-generational karma, they are getting a hint of the grief that was metted out by their ancestors.
So what are they doing? Running whimpering to their sycophants in Canberra, like Senator Campbell, who would be struggling to identify the Alpine National Park on a map. When in 1932 William Cooper, an aboriginal from Cummeragunga, wrote to the Federal government seeking land and opportunity for aboriginals as well as representation in parliament do you think he received such sympathetic treatment? Was there ministerial hand wringing at the loss of Australian heritage? I think you know the answer. The Government of the day refused to even acknowledge the receipt of the letter.
The mountain cattlemen have been grazing cattle and abusing this delicate national park for 170 years, which is far too long. Farming and grazing practices have changed a lot in 170 years boys. It is about time you brought your grazing practices into the 21st century.
It is inevitable that anyone who was getting such an excellent free ride at the expense of all Victorians and our delicate environment would be upset when it was taken away so there will undoubtedly be more protests. The Victorian government needs resolve and patience to weather these teacup storms while the dinosaur farming practices of the Mountain Cattlemen either evolve or become extinct. The reward will be a small part of our alpine ecosystem returned to its natural state.

Polititians respond to public pressure, you may like to communicate with Senator Campbell to advocate the resurrection of our whaling tradition or, hopefully, indicate your displeasure at his dinosaur attitudes towards our Alpine National Park. Like any respectible dinosaur he does not appear to have email, you will need to write to him at
Senator the Hon. Ian Campbell
Minister for the Environment and Heritage
Parliament House,
Canberra, ACT 2600
Similarly, you may wish to indicate your support for the Victorian Governments removal of cattle from the Alpine National Park by emailing John Thwaites, Minister for Environment and Minister for Water
(*statement has been augmented slightly as is the want of The Green Man, read the orginal here.)
Find out more from Department of Sustainability and Environment or Victorian National Parks Association
Buy a book on William Cooper here.
There are many jewels hidden amongst the leaves in this forgotten part of the ancient forest. Spend some time browsing and you are sure to find some. Click here or continue your search below
or read the most recent entries here.you ignorant wanker, when you have lived on a farm all your life then you have the right to say that its time to bring grazing practices up to the 21st century. If something works you stick with it.
Why don't you do something more constructive with your time rather than attacking you heritage. You need to understand other people live around you too, your opinions aren't always the right ones.
Also, if you lived in the Alpine region where we graze our cattle, you would realise that the vegetation in Park are known for their rejuvenation abilities. As for the water pollution, it doesn't stop me from drinking it. The grazing in the high plains prevents the threat of massive bushfires invading our town.
I can imagine you being one of those bush walkers right? Why aren't you attacking the tourist populus? Our herds don't drop plastic packaging.
Go and have another herbal tea. Bloody hippy.
Melissa, lead paint worked, yep we should have stuck with that. Slavery also worked for quite some time, I suppose you think we should have stuck with that too, along with the practice poisoning of the indigenous Taungurung aborigines with cynanide that your ancestors participated in. (Unlike your ancestors I have never participated in these practices but I still think I am entitled to believe they are wrong.)
My heritage is being destroyed by alpine grazing and it is time it was stopped. Melissa is of farming stock that is quite happy to trample on the heritage of the rest of us in a similar manner to that in which the cattle trample on the vegitation in the high country to pursue her own selfish ends.
Excuse me Melissa if I don't weep at the sessation of your rape of our natural environment. Personally I think the farmers should be sued for the damage that they have caused but sessation of damage is probably the best that can be hoped for.
Posted by: GreenMan at September 28, 2005 01:25 PMGreen Man you really are an idiot. Your heritage is being destroyed by alpine grazing, you say. Since when do you have a heritage in the mountains? You don't, you know it, but you claim one anyway. You're only a part-time interloper, a blow-in with a big mouth.
Two other points - where's your proof that the bog in your picture was destroyed by cattle? Doesn't look like it. Your picture shows widespread damage such as is seen in a deer wallow. You're pointing your ignorant finger in the wrong direction. Cattle rarely enter bogs for the simple reason that they tend to get bogged.
Your second picture also displays an effect that is not attributable to cattle. The pattern of cattle is to range widely over a given area, not to walk in straight lines with some intersecting patterns as your picture demonstrates. Any grazing expert, or anyone who has experience with cattle in the high country or anywhere else will tell you that. That's why the picture you post hasn't been widely seized upon by the opponents of alpine grazing - it's too easily rebutted.
You fell for it and in doing so you've made a fool of yourself.
Also, since when are heathlands delicate? Heath is robust and increases where there is bare ground to colonise. This is one of the arguments your green minded chums levy against cattle - they are alleged to create bare ground which increases the area inhabited by shrubs such as heath.
All in all Green Man you don't have much going for you, you poor silly ignoramus.
Posted by: Lou Maguire at January 28, 2006 07:20 AMHi Green Man. I am sooo impressed with your knowledge.
The Man From Snowy River wasn't a stockman or a cattleman, he didn't ride with stockmen, their stock horses never snuffed the battle with delight and stockmen have never told the story of his ride. That is a matter of real old regret.
Oh, did I hear you say, "Duh, the green man is sooo dumb!" Don't be so hard on yourself. Write boldly lad, and never fear the spills.
And now that your equanimity is restored please tell us all about the fagility of the Alpine National Park, please do. Tell us how you are so expert that you could look at a bucket of soil from The Howitt High Plains and distinguish it from another bucket of soil from the Andes.
Tell us that alpine grazing doesn't reduce blazing by keeping snowgrasses short and removing the dry tips, stopping the transport of fire to really flammable plant communities.
Hey, and even better tell us all what splendid condition the ungrazed areas of the Victorian Alps are in. They weren't burnt out three years ago were they? There's no real damage is there? Gosh, I mean there weren't huge areas of snowgum and woollybutt forest burnt were there? Tell me it isn't true, tell me, I implore you.
There weren't hundreds of sensitive sphagnum moss beds burnt out which will take 50 years and more to recover were there? The heathlands on steeper sides weren't touched either, were there, so there will be no erosion. Phew, what a relief.
And of course those awful mountain cattlemen with their archaic farming practices. Now that they've lost their leases they will have to come into the 21st century and start employing high fertiliser inputs on their properties, increasing the nutrient content in mountain rivers which didn't receive sufficient enrichment from the fires that didn't burn anything.
Letting cattle free range through sub-alpine bushland and open plains at an average of one cow per 100 ha on about 15 per cent of the Alpine National Park, thus avoiding the need to intensify production practices in their home paddocks is too old fashioned for words isn't it?
Oh yes, Green Man you are so wise. You are an oracle. You are an Archimedes.
Well, actually no.....you're an archenemy and a dickhead!
Posted by: katrina at January 28, 2006 02:27 PMPlease excuse silly typos attributable to feral children.
Para 4 fagility should be fragility.
Para 7, second line. First use of there should be they.
Now all is as it should be.
Posted by: Katrina at January 28, 2006 02:33 PMThe picture with the flowers is not a herbfield. LOL. Melissa is right, what a wanker. ROFL.
Anyhow, go and have a look at the same spot now and see how many flowers you'll find growing in the washout where rain and snow have swept away the topsoil since the fires burnt the plants and grasses.
Posted by: Steve Saunders at January 28, 2006 02:44 PMHow to Vote!!!!! Put Labor and The Greens second last and last.
Posted by: georgie at January 28, 2006 03:00 PMSo you would like to sue Mountain Cattlemen would you?
Guess what, maybe the Mountain Cattlemen might you sue for your deliberate and nasty, not to mention defamatory misquote of former MCAV president, Simon Turner.
"The decision to remove cattle grazing from the Alpine National Park has devastated mountain cattlemen, consigned a 170 year-old widely loved tradition of destroying delicate alpine flora and undermining the sensitive alpine ecosystem to the dusty shelves of history*"
You see matey, Simon didn't say that. You did. And you attributed it to him.
What if you did get sued? Wouldn't that be chickens coming home to roost. I hope you get your day in court.
Posted by: Phil at January 28, 2006 08:03 PMBy the way mate, you spell cessation like this, not sessation. You got it wrong twice so you're obviously not particularly well educated.
What a loser!
Posted by: Phil at January 28, 2006 08:09 PMThere is plenty of room in the Alpine National Park for a grazing zone.
The philosophy of National Parks is create representative areas, not to incarcerate massive tracts of lands into useless and badly managed firetraps.
If it has to be so big create heritage zones, wilderness zones etc so that all values, environmental and cultural can be accommodated.
Posted by: Tom at January 30, 2006 08:03 PMAhh Tom reasoned comment! How unusual in the comments section. Congratulations.
I agree a grazing zone may be able to be sustained and managed.
Posted by: Greenman at February 2, 2006 02:14 PMCattle grazing is about more than you'll never know. So keep your mouth shut!
Posted by: Lauren at November 14, 2006 11:56 AMWould just like to use this space to commend the heroic abilities of our local CFA volunteers, who have taken time off work without pay to fight our current bushfire. Maybe some of the 27 million newly appointed funds for the bushfire effort should head in that 'general' direction.
Surely by now, Greenman, you can see the effects of not grazing in the high country.
Posted by: Melissa La Spina at December 13, 2006 03:25 PMMelissa,
I too wish to express my sincere thanks to the CFA firefighters for their efforts in the recent fires. Of course the area you are referring to is national park and as such much of thanks goes to the firefighters of the Department of Sustainability and Environment. The very Department you are demonising.
As far as alpine grazing goes, most of the fuel that caused the intensity of these burns was fallen timber and leaf matter. My animal husbandry may be rudamentary but last time I looked these weren't popular foodstuffs for cows.
Posted by: Greenman at December 28, 2006 02:30 PMWow, what a reasoned, informed debate!
You all should be congratulated on your outstanding contributions to spelling and grammar.
Green man, i was referring to volunteers because as you may be too ignorant to realise that unlike the DSE, the volunteers take unpaid time off work in order to save their homes. Perhaps you should volunteer in the bush somewhere, you may even have your first encounter with a cow.
Posted by: Melissa at June 16, 2008 09:30 PM